1. The Cheongju District Court rendered a decision on November 4, 2009 between the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties and the Defendant.

1. A claim for the interruption of extinctive prescription against the judgment of the Cheongju District Court Branching the Cheongju District Court 2009Kadan5332, which became final and conclusive between the plaintiff, the appointed party, and the defendant;

2. Article 208 (3) 1 and Article 257 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. The instant lawsuit seeking interruption of extinctive prescription is an act of managing and preserving a claim, and thus, even if an obligee winss as the Plaintiff, the relevant litigation cost shall be borne by the obligee.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2015Da232316 Decided October 18, 2018, etc.)