beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for six months, for Defendant B and D, for Defendant C with a fine of three million won, and for Defendant E.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
E is the actual owner who entered into a lease agreement after investing the operating capital of H gameland in Daegu Northern-gu G. Defendant A actually carried out the said H gameland according to the direction of Defendant E. Defendant B was an employee who received KRW 100,000 per day and settled the game scores in the above H gameland. Defendant C was an employee who received KRW 70,000 per day and was in charge of coffee, cleaning, etc. in the above H gameland. Defendant D was an employee who received KRW 150,000 per day and was in charge of money exchange in the above H gameland.
1. The Defendants in collusion with each other to commit speculative acts, from July 23, 2015 to the same year.
8. From 08:50 on June 26, 208, in the above H Gameland, 50 games of “sea Stop” shall be installed, and when 10,000 won is inserted in the above game machine, 10,000 won is created on the screen, and 5,000 points for the first time, and 3,000 points for the upper, and 10,000 points for the subscription shall be calculated by converting the points so obtained into 10,000 won per 10,000 won per ticket, and then converting the points so obtained into 10,000 won per exchange.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to use the speculative gaming machines to allow customers to take advantage of the speculative method and to take property benefits, thereby allowing them to engage in speculative business.
2. The Defendants conspired to exchange for money and had customers exchange in cash according to points obtained through the use of game water at the time and place specified in paragraph 1. The Defendants engaged in money exchange business.
3. Defendant E and Defendant A conspired to provide 40 marine stopy games with settlement function differently from the date and time specified in paragraph 1, and at the place of the rating classification.
Summary of Evidence
1..