logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.12.12 2017고단3094
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On August 19, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.050% among blood transfusions on August 22, 2016, the Defendant driven a low-speed car owned by the Defendant, at the time of making a week, in approximately one kilometer from the Sinan-Eup to the front of the D convenience store located in C.

2. Determination

A. The facts charged in a criminal trial must be proved by the prosecutor, and the judge should find the defendant guilty with probative value that leads to the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt of guilt against the defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2003Do3455, Sept. 2, 2003). B. The calculation of alcohol concentration from blood measured after a certain time from the specific driving point of time is based on the blood alcohol concentration among blood measured after a specific driving point of time, and thus, the calculation of alcohol concentration is based on the blood alcohol concentration from the blood measured after the specific driving point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the point of time to the above 30 percent alcohol concentration among blood alcohol concentration can not be determined by the above 10.

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

(1) On August 19, 2017, the Defendant drank the beer can (500 m, etc.) with the F convenience store in Jeju-si E from August 19, 2017 during the period when the Defendant was doing so and driving at a night.

Shebly, the defendant drives his own vehicle again before D convenience stores located in C at around August 19, 2017, when he proposed around 22:17.

arrow