Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in the duty of driving QM5 automobiles in QM5 vehicles.

On February 14, 2019, around 19:50, the national highways No. D, 6, located in Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun C, was driven by the said vehicle, and the three-lane roads in the direction of Hongcheon-gun were driven by the city at the speed of 107.18 km in Seoul.

There are two lanes, and every 80 km point at a restricted speed, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by complying with the restricted speed as a driver, operating steering devices and brakes accurately.

Nevertheless, the speed limit is not neglected and is proceeding more than 27.18 km every hour.

A victim E (ma, 67 years old) crossing a road installed by a central separation zone from the right-hand side of the proceeding direction to the left-hand side of the road was shocked to the upper-hand side of the vehicle, resulting in the death of the said victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's legal statement

1. A traffic accident report (1) (1)

1. On-site map and on-site photograph;

1. Gabbboxes, images of the Gabbox and photographs to take a course;

1. A traffic accident analysis report (the Gyeonggi-do Branch of the Road Traffic Authority);

1. As to the defense counsel’s assertion of the death certificate, the defense counsel asserts that there was no light, such as street lamps, signboards, etc. at the accident scene, and the defendant could not find the victim in advance, whether he/she was in his/her own discretion or at the place where the headlights are not kept. At the time of finding the victim, the victim could not avoid the accident because the distance between the victim and the victim is too too high.

Even if it was difficult for the defendant to find the victim immediately before the collision, the person who wants to cross without permission shall take into account the road situation and prepare to start the crossing, and the victim could have seen the defendant's driver's vehicle moving on the head of the road at a distance. Thus, the crossing was commenced by thinking that the victim can cross the vehicle without placing on the above vehicle, and the vehicle of the defendant is earlier than what he thought.