The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for 10 months, 2 years and 80 hours’ alcohol addiction and violent therapy lectures) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following facts: (a) the judgment of the court below is based on such favorable sentencing grounds as the confession of the crime and the Defendant’s confession, the degree of injury is not serious; and (b) the investigative agency has agreed with the victim; (c) the same criminal records have been sentenced four times; (d) one of them has been sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment; and (d) other unfavorable sentencing grounds, including the fact that there are many different criminal records; (e) the Defendant’s age, family relationship, economic situation, circumstances leading to the crime, and motive leading to the crime; and (e) all other matters regarding the sentencing as indicated in the records and changes of the records of this case, the punishment of the court below is deemed appropriate

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.