logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1969. 3. 25. 선고 68므29 판결
[이혼,위자료][집17(1)민,373]
Main Issues

Cases falling under Article 840 subparagraph 3 of the Civil Act when so-called "spouse or lineal ascendant has been extremely maltreated";

Summary of Judgment

If a person plans suicide by being implemented by the Si and the father of the Si and the father, and is forced to leave his/her family to friendship, it constitutes a reason for divorce under subparagraph 3 of this Article.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 840 of the Civil Act

Claimant-Appellee

Claimant

appellee-Appellant

appellee 1

Judgment of the lower court

Cheongju area in the first instance, Seoul High Court Decision 67Reu58 delivered on June 21, 1968

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the appellee.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal by the respondent are examined.

In light of the contents of evidence No. 4 and evidence No. 1 cited in the original judgment No. 1 and all the purport of this case’s testimony and evidence No. 1 cited in the original judgment, the respondent 1 and his father, on the grounds that the appellant is somewhat low enough, and the respondent 2 together abused the appellant by using verbal abuse, which means that the appellant her father her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her, and the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the defendant’s remaining agricultural chemicals her husband her husband her husband she could not be found to have been her husband her husband her husband her husband her.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed by the assent of all participating judges, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Supreme Court Judge Ma-dong (Presiding Judge) Ma-dong (Presiding Judge)

arrow