logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.08.24 2017고단1061
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of two years, imprisonment of four years, imprisonment of one year and eight months, and imprisonment of two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The organization of the telephone financing fraud (one-to-one voice 1061) of the 2017 Highest 1061 takes part in the role of the organization that deceivings many and unspecified persons by means of leakage of personal information, criminal case, etc., and by inducing victims to withdraw deposits, installment savings, etc., and by deceiving them through a sound method. The organization is in charge of systematic communication among the braille organizations. The organization takes charge of the crime, taking charge of the crime, taking charge of the crime, and taking charge of the victim's telephone and deceiving the victims by misrepresenting the public prosecutor, etc. using the server in a foreign country, such as China. The organization takes part in the role such as the " call center" in which the victims deceives the victims by telephone, and directly collecting money from the victims at the scene of the crime, the "book of collection (one-to-one)" in which the victims directly collect money from the victim, and the "transfer of money from China, etc." to the victims abroad.

Defendant

D) On January 2017, 2017, Defendant A was recruited as a collection book on the condition that 3% of the amount of damage would be distributed to Defendant A in accordance with the proposal of Defendant D’s first and second police officers (hereinafter “K orL”). Defendant B was recruited as a collection book on February 2, 2017 through Defendant B’s second and last police officers, and Defendant A was collected on the condition that 3% of the amount of damage per unit would be distributed to Defendant D’s first and second police officers on the condition that 3% of the amount of damage per unit would be distributed to Defendant D’s first and second police officers on the condition that 3% of the amount of damage per unit would be distributed to Defendant D’s first and second in order pursuant to Defendant D’s proposal, and Defendant C took part in the criminal act on the condition that 3% of the amount of damage per unit would be distributed to Defendant D’s first and second in order, and Defendant C took part in the collection book on February 2017 as a collection book on the first and second in order.

1. Joint crimes with Defendant D and Defendant A’s name incompetence [the act of fraud against Defendant J.

arrow