1. The Defendant’s KRW 212,511,468 as well as 5% per annum from January 15, 2018 to June 12, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) C: (a) around 16:45 January 15, 2018, D1 ton cargo vehicles for D1 ton (hereinafter “Plaintiff”)

(ii) Gastren Cystto car (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) with the FF driver’s license, driving the said intersection from the J village to the fracking ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic

) The front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle was in conflict with the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) 2) The Plaintiff, a female of C, was accompanied by the head of the Plaintiff’s vehicle. However, due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff sustained an injury, such as the abrupting of the 4th century.

3) The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract against the Defendant vehicle. The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with the Defendant vehicle. The ground for recognition exists without any dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 13, and Eul evidence No. 2 (including the serial number;

each entry or video, the whole purport of the pleading;

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident as the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring any special circumstance, since the Plaintiff was injured by the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle.

C. Limit of liability, however, according to the statements or images set forth in the evidence Nos. 2-1 to 24, even though it is difficult to conclude that C entered the intersection as it does not stop a temporary stop line on yellow signal, C is driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle by dividing its talk with the Plaintiff.

It is recognized that the accident of this case was neglected in Jeonju, and considering the circumstances surrounding the accident of this case and the situation surrounding and following it, such as the fact that the accident of this case occurred on the roads of this case, which were located at the house from the land owner for the plaintiff who returned temporarily in Canada.