The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment of Defendant B (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The judgment of the court below which acquitted Defendant A of the facts charged in the instant case on the ground that the prosecutor could recognize the victim’s her her her her her her her son

2. In full view of the determination of Defendant B’s assertion, the first instance court held that the Defendant agreed with the victim, the Defendant’s recognition of and reflects on the instant crime, the Defendant’s primary offender, and the Defendant’s age, occupation, and other matters on the sentencing specified in the records and arguments, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is unreasonable.

3. Judgment on the prosecutor's assertion

A. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is currently serving as a director of the “F” company located in the Seo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, and the victim G (V, 22 years of age) is a person who entered the above company on October 7, 2012 and retired on March 28, 2013.

On January 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 13:00, around 13:00, the Defendant: (b) was able to take care of the victim’s desire to engage in the banking business within the Korean bank located in the Gandong-gu, Busan, and (c) was 4:5 times in his hands even though the victim was able to put bad votes.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed indecent acts against the victim under his supervision due to business relations by force.

B. As to the judgment of the court below, although the contents of the victim's statement were consistent and specific from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, the victim did not have any physical contact with the defendant in any place other than the crime of this case, and the victim stated that he did not have any jurisdiction over the defendant at the time of the crime of this case but has been spreaded, and that the defendant was unable to completely memory the fact of the crime of this case, and that the victim was physically contacted the defendant.