logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.06.22 2016고정788
사기미수
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the mother of Defendant B, and the F in 17 months is the son of Defendant B.

Defendant

B around February 20, 2012, around February 20, when the insured and the insured’s family members suffered damage to the other’s body and property, the insured and the insured subscribed to “family daily life compensation liability” under a special agreement that compensates for such damage.

The Defendants, who were the dynamics of Defendant A and F, caused the Defendant A to have a handsaw management to “I” located within the H building in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H on February 23, 2013, and Defendant A was kid.

45 million won or more was lost by Defendant A’s negligence at a place where it is difficult to identify the place where the Montreal was located, and it was searched by the store and the vehicle on which the Defendants were on board.

Defendants, around July 2013, at the time of the loss of the Amond Ban by the private person J of the insurance design, which had been playing at Defendant A’s house.

seeing that if the counter-place is lost due to F, insurance money may be received, and Defendant A had the F inflicted on Defendant A’s hand.

In the process of using turgy, it was demanded to request the claim for insurance money to the effect that it would be lost by deducting it from the process of using turging, and the defendant B conspired to obtain insurance money from the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendants got her hand in the process of leaving the J from her sof to her hand in the process of leaving the her hand.

On January 20, 2014, the Court requested for the claim of insurance money to the effect that the counter-party was missing, and on January 20, 2014, the Court received the insurance accident with the victim Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. by wire at the request of the Defendants.

In addition, according to the orders of Defendant A around March 11, 2014, Defendant B was due to the H building F at around 4:00 p.m. on February 23, 2013 at the house of Defendant B located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K Apartment 102 Dong 1004.

arrow