1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Basic Facts

The reasoning for this part of this Court is that the reasoning for this Court is as stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the following dismissal or addition. Therefore, this part of the reasoning of the first instance judgment is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence

Of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance, the "D building" in the 2nd part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed "Y building", and the "19 households" shall be deemed "three households".

E of the first instance judgment, among the reasons for the first instance judgment.

subsection (5) of this section shall be subject to the transfer of ownership of subsection (1) 1 and 5 of this section.

“Post-Agreement” is referred to as the “Agreement of May 30, 2014.”

In addition, “A. The Plaintiff shall immediately transfer the name of the owner of the instant building and the name of the farmland diversion to the Plaintiff’s name in the name of the owner of the instant building,” among the grounds of the first instance judgment.

“2. The Plaintiff shall immediately transfer the name of the owner and the name of the farmland diversion of the instant building to the name of the Defendant as to the instant building.

"Alongly, I am out of the reasons for the first instance judgment."

subsection (1) of this section shall be as follows:

"On the other hand, on January 20, 2015, the Defendant cancelled the contract to transfer the name of the owner of the instant building, which was concluded between Q, etc., the original acquisitor of the instant building, to H, which was designated by Q, etc., and accordingly, H is obligated to perform the procedure for change of the name of the owner, and H is obligated to perform the procedure for change of the name of the owner on May 30, 2014, on the other hand, to the Defendant according to the agreement of Q, etc., and, on the other hand, H is obligated to perform the procedure for change of the name of the owner of the instant building. The Defendant filed a lawsuit for the performance of the procedure for change of the name of the owner

On June 1, 2016, the District Court rendered a judgment that “H shall implement the procedure for change of the name of the owner with respect to the instant building permit to the Defendant” by accepting the claim pursuant to the agreement on May 30, 2014 among the Defendant’s claims, and then the said judgment is the Seoul High Court.