1. The defendant is not guilty; 2. The defendant shall reject an application for compensation by the applicant for compensation.

At around November 19, 2015, the Defendant demanded to present that the Defendant would have prepared the name of the victim in the name of F store run by the Defendant E in Seosan-si, Seosan-si, to check the receipt of the loan.

Therefore, the injured party, who shows the loan certificate to the defendant in the form of the loan certificate, received a certificate of loan, and caused the utility by tearing one copy of the loan certificate owned by the injured party in the form of a toilet change.

The defense counsel's assertion that the loan certificate of this case is owned by D

It can not be seen that the Defendant did not commit a crime even if he destroys the loan certificate of this case.

Judgment

1. In full view of the basic facts prosecutor and the evidence presented by the defense counsel, the following facts can be acknowledged.

A. The Defendant borrowed KRW 20,00,000 from G through D on March 5, 2010.

B. From April 2010 to July 2010, the Defendant deposited KRW 400,000 per month interest into the account in the name of G.

(c)

D around August 2010, when the defendant paid interest to G on behalf of the defendant on behalf of the defendant, the defendant demanded the payment of interest to him.

Around that time, the Defendant prepared a loan certificate (hereinafter “the loan certificate of this case”) with D, and paid interest on the loan of this case in cash or through the account from that time.

(d)

On January 4, 2012, the Defendant deposited KRW 400,000 directly in the account in the name of G because it did not say that D repaid interest on G, but again paid KRW 400,000 to D on March 13, 2012.

E. Around January 2013, the Defendant: (a) around January 2013, the Defendant: (b) A paid the principal to G.

In other words, D paid KRW 3,00,000 on January 23, 2013, and KRW 5,000,000 on January 24, 2013, and for the same reason, D paid KRW 3,00,000 on October 2, 2013.

F. G around November 15, 2015, after finding the Defendant around November 15, 2015, demanded that the Defendant repay KRW 20,000,000.

Accordingly, the defendant paid 18,00,000 won to D among them.

The defect, the remaining principal of G 2,00,000 won.