1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that, in light of the fact that Article 7 subparagraph 3 of the Enforcement Rule of the Development Restriction Zone Act provides that "if it is inevitably required to install a gas station due to the construction or expansion of a road, a significant increase in traffic volume, etc., the placement plan under Article 7 subparagraph 3 of the Enforcement Rule of the Development Restriction Zone Act shall be changed only when the gas station should be additionally installed due to the construction or expansion of a road, a significant increase in traffic volume, etc., it shall not be deemed that the plan for placement according to the public notice of this case is completed because the registration of a gas station and the commencement of a business according to the placement plan by each route, it shall not be deemed that the placement

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.