logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.04.04 2017고단2542
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant B's imprisonment of two years and six months, Defendant C's imprisonment of three years and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 10, 2016, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months and fine of 10,000,000 won by violating the National Sports Promotion Act at the Seoul Central District Court on November 10, 2016. On May 25, 2017, Defendant B completed the execution of the above sentence at the Seoul Detention Center.

Defendant

C On January 28, 2016, the Seoul High Court sentenced one year to imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the composition and activities of organizations, etc.) at the Seoul High Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 5, 2016 at the Seoul Detention Center.

Defendant

D On June 3, 2016, the Seoul Central District Court was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 3,000,000 won, and 2 years of suspended execution as a result of a violation of the National Sports Promotion Act. On August 28, 2017, the Seoul Northern District Court was sentenced to 1,00,000 won as a crime of gambling.

1. The Defendants’ habitual gambling, around June 2017, he operated the ballast (in the case of a private bridge game, even though gambling sites operate so that a large amount of showing amount takes place during a hole or even, in order to raise the rate of riding, it refers to the method of gambling by which the Defendants obtain in advance information about where a large amount of showing is carried out, and go through gambling in opposition) and both-out hostings (the two-out hosting means means by which the gambling sites first subscribed to, using the fact that 10-15% of the charged amount at the time of their initial subscription to, and the fact that the Defendants would receive 10-15% of the charged amount at one site after entering a multiple-site, and the remainder of the website would be easily distributed to the Defendants through 15 times the amount of money that they received by one and the other 15% of the total amount of money.).

According to the above mother, Defendant A is in gambling.

arrow