1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claim for damages selectively added in the trial are dismissed, respectively.

2. Appeal;

1. Basic facts

A. On April 10, 2009, the Plaintiff, engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling teaching materials and educational materials, sold various English language textbooks, teaching materials, etc. to child-care centers, kindergartens, etc., while entering into an entrustment contract with a private chain C (SPD, representative E, hereinafter “instant business”) with a private business chain, thereby entrusting the instant business with the custody of the above English textbooks, teaching materials, and teaching materials.

나. 주식회사 타라 티.피.에스는 원고에 대한 인쇄대금채권에 기하여 2011. 11. 29. 의정부지방법원 2011카단51234호로 채무자를 원고, 제3채무자를 주식회사 C(본점소재지 파주시 D, 대표이사 E, 이하 ‘이 사건 회사’라 한다), 피압류채권을 ‘제3채무자가 채무자를 위하여 보관 중인 샤샤1, 2, 3 영어 교재 등의 인도청구권’으로 하여 유체동산인도청구권가압류 신청을 하였고, 그 결과 2011. 12. 8. 이를 인용하는 내용의 가압류결정이 발령되어 2011. 12. 26. 원고에게 송달되었다

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant provisional seizure”) C.

On January 6, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract on delegation of a lawsuit (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant, an attorney-at-law, to file an objection, etc. to the instant provisional seizure, and paid KRW 3 million as the fees for the instant case (hereinafter “instant fees”). On January 9, 2012, the Defendant sent a written notice of content certification to the instant company, as an agent of A Co., Ltd. (RepresentativeF) on the date of the Plaintiff’s request, in addition to the content certification as of November 23, 2011, stating that “the sender has taken over all remaining books that are not subject to the instant provisional seizure, and actively cooperate with the Plaintiff’s taking over the instant books that are not subject to the instant provisional seizure.” D.

In addition, the defendant, on January 10, 2012, provisionally seized the case in order to 2012Kadan50026, Goyang-gu District Court 201.