logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2016.11.23 2016가합298
허가명의변경절차이행 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. The defendant is about the business permission stated in the attached list to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Article 5 of the lease contract concluded on April 28, 2008 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant stating that “Lessee may be reconstructed or altered with the approval of the lessor, but the lessee will be the original restoration key at the lessee’s expense before the date of return of the real estate.” Thus, the Defendant, the lessee, as the lessee, is deemed to have the duty to restore the lessor to the Plaintiff, to implement the procedure for discontinuance of business regarding the instant business license, but it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff’s primary claim is without merit.

3. Determination as to the conjunctive claim (i.e., the plaintiff's conjunctive claim is reasonable) by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

arrow