logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.14 2018구합75
낚시터업유효기간연장허가신청반려반송처분취소
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, an application for extension of the term of validity of a fishing place business as of February 24, 2016 is filed for the cancellation of the return disposition.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 15, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) obtained permission to operate a fishing place business (D) in accordance with Article 10 of the Fishing Management and Promotion Act; (b) Articles 4(3), 6(2), and 13(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act for a period of three years from April 15, 2013 to December 31, 2015, with respect to a reservoir C (hereinafter “instant reservoir”) located in Ansan-si B from the Defendant; and (c) installed and operated ancillary facilities after obtaining the permission to operate a fishing place business (D for a fishing place business in the year 2013).

B. On December 16, 2015, the Plaintiff received an application for a permit to extend the validity of a fishing place business (Evidence A2) from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 from the Defendant for a period of three years from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018.

C. On February 24, 2016, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a letter of “a return of all related documents following the failure to submit documents for an application for a permit for a fishing place business” with the following contents as follows:

(hereinafter “Return of the petition documents of this case”). A return of all related documents following the failure to meet the documents specified in the application for a permit for a fishing place business

2. The thickness submitted a “application for a permit for a fishing place business” to extend the validity of a permit for a fishing place business in December of the past year, but it was anticipated that the procedure for approving the use of waters was difficult, and documents were kept under the condition that approval for use (a lease agreement on water surface) for purposes other than the purpose will be supplemented in the future;

3. Since this is in violation of the procedures for processing civil petition documents, it is possible to return all relevant documents and file a re-application at the time of preparation of the WIG lease contract.

The representative of the fishing place name E The rental period for the domicile of the plaintiff in his/her place of business from April 15, 2013 to December 31, 2015.

D. On February 8, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for a permit for a fishing place business (extension of the validity period) with the period of validity for five years from April 16, 2018 to December 31, 2023, while the instant lawsuit is pending, but the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application on February 14, 2018 as follows.

b.0.0 c.

arrow