beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On December 7, 2013, the Plaintiff, as a foreigner of Egypt nationality, entered the Republic of Korea with the visa of the Tourism Department (B-2). On December 26, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for refugee status to the Defendant.
B. On November 12, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff cannot be deemed as having “a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would suffer from persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).
C. On December 9, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the said objection was dismissed on July 1, 2015.
[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff asserted that, around April 201, the Plaintiff joined the Free Assembly, and participated twice in a demonstration that urged the presidential election. On January 201, 201, in the election of National Assembly members and the presidential election on June 2012, the Plaintiff supported the candidates for the free Assembly, and posted a letter to support the Muslim-type proposal on his own website and on his own website.
After the plaintiff's departure from Egypt on June 18, 2013 in order to meet his/her family members in the Philippines, military coupa took place, and the National Institute of Free Family was reduced, and on December 25, 2013, the government non-slock group was published as a terrorist organization, and the members of Egym-type slock group were killed.
If the plaintiff returned to Egypt, the disposition of this case which did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee despite the possibility of persecution by the government as a person who publicly posted a letter supporting the Egypt by a member of Egypt, was unlawful.
(1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 and Article 18 of the Refugee Act;