The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the lower court’s punishment (three million won of a fine) is too unhued.

2. The judgment of the defendant has several times the records of punishment for the same crime, and the defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment on March 20, 208 due to violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection, etc. of Victims (Rape, etc. under the age of 13) on January 25, 2013 and committed the crime of this case at least four months after the release despite the completion of the execution of the sentence. However, the defendant seems to have been trying to adapt to society with occupation after the release, and the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case by contingently, including the fact that the defendant was deemed to have committed the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant was employed as an air-conditioning engineer, the fact that the F who was employed as an air-conditioning engineer was agreed with the victim and the fact that the defendant was an air-conditioning engineer, and thus, it is unreasonable to accept the prosecutor's assertion that the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.