logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2014.09.03 2014고단627
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From 2013, the Defendants were members of the Bosing Fraud Group located in the French Cheongyang area (hereinafter referred to as the Cheongyang area) from around 2013.

As a counselor of the above organization’s telephone, the Defendants conspired with E (the judgment at the appellate court on March 17, 2014), F in charge of overall administration of offices, G, H (the foregoing phone counselor), I (the foregoing phone counselor), J, K (the detention court on May 16, 2014), J, and K (the court of appeal on July 22, 2014, and the appellate court on July 22, 2014), L, M, and the withdrawal manager (the above court of appeal) (the above court of first instance on March 19, 2014, and the court of appeal) who is an employee of financial institutions or lending companies, to call to the victims of the existing loan or send text messages, and to receive 20% of the amount of money by fraud, such as deposit money, expense for conciliation, credit rating, loan repayment, etc., and to receive 20% of the amount of money from the telephone passbook.

According to the above public offering of crime, the general account E was responsible for exercising overall control over the crime, such as leasing the office of the Bophishing Fraud, managing criminal proceeds, etc. The F, upon securing personal information related to loans necessary for the crime, sent letters to the victims, ordering them to report letters to the counselors, and, upon receiving the report that the deposits were successful by the counselors’ work, the F, by collecting money through the withdrawal team, made the victims deposit the money into the Chinese exchange account, and by paying the counselors’ monthly salary, was in charge of exercising overall control over the operation of the above organization’s office. The Defendants, along with the O, G, J, H, K, and I, took the role of the telephone counselor under the direction of the victim, and transferred the money to the large account by deceiving the victims.

arrow