A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around May 2013, when the Defendant came to know with the victim C who had been employed as an employee of the company in the past, and became aware of the business contact with the victim, the Defendant got a telephone from the victim on May 2013. “It would be customary to pay 10-20% of the construction amount to the contractor broker at the Jeju Myeongian implementer who had the contract executed the land development project in Daejeon by linking the city event and the landowner with the contract by connecting the land owner. It would be paid to the contractor at the time, and the amount of 60 million won has to be increased. The money would be needed to carry out the siren project in Daejeon at Daejeon. The money would be paid in 10 million won every three million won every week from Daejeon.” The purport of the business is to provide the victim with the proposal that the victim would consent to the project, and the victim should receive the money by means of borrowing the loan to the victim, etc., and then let the victim receive it.

1. On June 3, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim of the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office of Automobile Sales Co., Ltd. that “I will attract investment. If the business is wrong, I would like to pay 18 million won in loan to the Plaintiff in the name of the Party because the purchase of the business vehicle and the business fund is required due to the fault of the business.”

However, in fact, the plan that the Defendant-friendly offer G purchased a site from the Hansung Insurance Co., Ltd. and intended to choose urban life housing was no longer proceeded with while selling the site at a different place. The first instance H thought that the above plan was normally implemented and that G was 600 million won, and if G was funded, it was thought that it would be entrusted to the Defendant with the operation of the siren, and that the plan was very inappropriate for the Defendant to raise the funds necessary for the rental car project, such as there was no 60 million won flock. In addition, at the time, the Defendant was in arrears of KRW 1.5 million, and at the time, the Defendant was a bad credit holder in financial institutions.