1. Of the instant lawsuits, the part of the claim for revocation of the revocation of the additional medical care and additional medical care shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 25, 2013, while working for the Jinsan City Construction Co., Ltd., the Plaintiff was an accident where the left-hand bridge was shocked on the Gohap which was on the strong wind, while performing the removal work at a construction site of about seven meters high from Apr. 25, 2013.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The Plaintiff received medical care benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act until October 18, 2013 with respect to “the instant approved injury to the stokes and stokes,” which suffered from the instant accident (hereinafter “the instant approved injury”), and received the lump-sum disability payment on the ground that the stokes remain as No. 14th 10 (the remainder of the stokes) of disability grade on the ground that the general stokes remain.

C. Thereafter, on December 3, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury and additional medical care with respect to the damage to the festal flads and urgal part on the left part of the left part (hereinafter “instant additional injury”). On December 17, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition not to approve the said application on the ground that “The instant additional injury and disease cannot be recognized as proximate causal relation with the instant accident, and it is difficult to deem that the symptoms have deteriorated compared to the instant accident at the time of the completion of medical care.”

(hereinafter “instant No. 1 Disposition”) D.

On May 16, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the above disposition (Seoul District Court 2015Gudan1309) against the instant disposition, and on May 16, 2016, the Plaintiff rendered a recommendation of mediation to the effect that “The Defendant revoked the non-approval of the additional injury and disease among the instant disposition No. 1, and subsequently approved the instant additional injury and disease as an additional injury and disease, and the Plaintiff fully withdraws the lawsuit.”

E. On August 3, 2016, the Defendant revoked the part concerning the recognition of the non-approval of the additional injury and disease among the instant Disposition No. 1, and subsequently approved the instant additional injury and disease as an additional injury and disease. On August 22, 2016, the Plaintiff voluntarily withdrawn the lawsuit regarding the instant Disposition No. 1.

F. The plaintiff thereafter.