logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.06.18 2017고단3070
업무상횡령등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From around 2010 to June 23, 2017, the Defendant, “F,” who works for the garment store “F” store, was in charge of the sales of clothing, etc., while working for the garment store “F” store managed by the Victim F, Ltd. F (hereinafter “F”).

When selling the clothing supplied by the victim company, the defendant borrowed money from the customer, sold the clothing in cash on behalf of the customer intentionally, and omitted entry in the sale daily bulletin, etc., in order to embezzled the clothes or sales proceeds in the business.

On November 3, 2016, the Defendant embezzled total of KRW 198,64,40,00 in total 256 times from May 1, 2010 to June 22, 2017, as indicated in the list of crimes in the separate sheet of crimes, by paying 9,864,00 won in lieu of a special mincing mincing 1 punishment in the market price in which the Defendant used credit card or borrowed money from his/her customers at the above F store, and embezzled the same as the payment for the said money.

"2018 Highest 471"

1. On October 8, 2015, the Defendant against the victim G is lacking in money to purchase hair from the F head office to the victim G at the above store.

To lend money, to sell the fee immediately and to complete the payment.

“A false representation was made.”

However, around that time, the Defendant, without any particular property, was liable to pay 100 million won or more to individual creditors, including H, while working in the store as a manager of the above store. The Defendant was also liable to the lending company. In particular, by arbitrarily deducting the significance supplied by F for the repayment of the above obligation, the Defendant used the company’s public funds by means of using the company’s funds by performing the obligation to the individual creditors instead of the clothes, or omitting the entry in the daily report of sales after selling the clothing supplied by F in cash.

arrow