1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The president of the Labor Union president C, the representative of the Plaintiff’s Association C (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff’s Union”) was a superior organization of the Plaintiff’s Plaintiff, before the 9th regular meeting (hereinafter referred to as “the instant regular meeting”) held from September 29, 2014 to October 1, 2014 as an agenda such as the Plaintiff’s election of the president of the general meeting, the president of the Labor Union president C (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant’s Assembly”) recommended D pastors who unconstitutionally reported the disabled persons to the Defendant’s general meeting and who paid a large amount of mission expenses to the Defendant’s general meeting. The president of the Labor Union distributed a text message to the pastors belonging to the Defendant’s general meeting, on September 29, 2014, the day on which the regular general meeting was held, the extension of the voting rights of the president of the general meeting, the increase of the amount of the development fund paid by the president of the general meeting, and the number of executive officers related to the completion of qualifications.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant sanctions” subject to the instant sanctions

On October 10, 2014, the Defendant’s general meeting passed a resolution of “1 warning and restriction on the general authority” on the grounds that the instant sanctions against C constituted “illegal election campaign, dissemination of false facts, and distribution of illegal inducements.” On October 15, 2014, the Defendant’s general meeting recommended C to “the submission of a letter of apology and a written prevention of recurrence,” and to “personal apology and explanation, within 30 days after receipt of the official document,” as the official document from October 15, 2014 (hereinafter “the first warning resolution and notification”).

In light of the fact that C does not take any measure despite the first warning and notification at the meeting of the executive officers on December 1, 2014, the head of the general meeting may recommend a person who violates the resolution of the general meeting under Article 86 of the Enforcement Rule of the Constitution to restrict the general meeting and the general meeting of the union members by the resolution of the board of directors of the general meeting. If this recommendation is not implemented within 30 days, the head of the general meeting may impose sanctions by the resolution of the board of directors of the general meeting.