The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the period of three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As the Defendant did not pass through the stop line without a temporary stop, it is not negligent, and even if the Defendant violated the duty of temporary suspension at the time, the relationship with the instant accident in which the victim died is not recognized.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts that affected the conclusion of the judgment, which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case.

B. The sentence sentenced by the court below to the defendant (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant also asserted the same purport as the grounds for appeal, and the lower court rejected the judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts.

Examining the above judgment of the court below in comparison with the records, the judgment of the court below is just.

또 한, 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들 및 이에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 신호정리를 하지 않고 있던 이 사건 T 자형 교차로에서 피해자의 트럭 차량은 T의 위 ‘ ㅡ’ 부분에서 좌에서 우로 직진하고 있었고, 피고인은 T의 'I' 부분의 밑에서 진입하여 좌회전하려고 하던 중에 이 사건 사고가 발생하였는바, 피고인처럼 좌회전하려고 하는 운전자는 그 교 차로에서 직진하거나 우회전하려는 다른 차가 있을 때에는 그 차에 진로를 양보하여야 하는 점( 도로 교통법 제 26조 제 4 항), ② 객관적인 입장에 있는 증인이면서 이 사건 사고를 목격하기에 가장 좋은 위치에 있었던

According to the K's statement in the court below and the investigative agency, the defendant had access to the lane where the victim is driving without properly examining whether the vehicle is going through the intersection in this case, and then found the victim's truck.