1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with B and C rocketing vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”). The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with D and Earbro vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. At around 19:30 on October 16, 2013, D driven the Defendant vehicle, driving the Defendant vehicle, and driving the three-lane of the four-lane road (hereinafter “instant road”) adjacent to the entrance of the construction site of the Seosung-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnamnam University at Daejeon (Seoul-gu, the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the vehicle of the Plaintiff (the Plaintiff’s Intervenor) without avoiding any collision with the Plaintiff’s driver’s vehicle (the Plaintiff’s Intervenor) who was directly directed in the same direction in the same direction in the two-lane left right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand side

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Defendant’s vehicle immediately before the shock was proceeding to the left side of the wheels.

C. Between the first, the second and the third and fourth lanes of the instant road are set up, and the group of street trees is growing at regular intervals. The group of street trees is growing at regular intervals.

The point of accident of this case is on the intersection where signal lights are installed, and the signal lights for direct transit vehicles are installed on the 1,2, and 3, and 4 lanes. In order to turn to the left at the apartment construction site, signal lights are installed on the squad installed between the two lanes and 3, and the left turn turn is marked at the entrance of the apartment construction site from the entrance of the apartment construction site to the center line, and there is no turn turn signal or U-turn turn signal for the vehicles directly located in the same direction as the Plaintiff and the Defendant vehicle.

The defendant filed an application with the plaintiff for deliberation and coordination on the ratio of negligence of both parties with respect to material damage of the defendant vehicle.