logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.04.03 2018구합25648
건축허가(용도변경) 불허가 처분취소
Text

1. The decision that the Defendant rendered on September 18, 2018 by denying the alteration of the use of the building to the Plaintiff is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 17, 2017, the Plaintiff purchased two lots and one underground floor above, and five floors above ground (hereinafter “instant building”) from Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Plaintiff on the 24th of the same month.

B. On October 10, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for permission to alter the purpose of the instant building as follows.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant application”) is intended to change the purpose of the instant application into the top soldier’s cultural and assembly facility group under Article 19(4)4 of the Building Act and the education and welfare facility group under Article 19(4)6, and thus, it is subject to permission pursuant to Article 19(2) of the Building Act.

Class I neighborhood living facilities of 1228.26 - General bath education and research facilities - General bath education and research facilities - Other education and research facilities - Class I neighborhood living facilities of 2575.86 - General bath education and research facilities - Other education and research facilities - Office of Class II neighborhood living facilities of 3178.63 on the ground - Religious facilities - Office of 3397.23 - Class II neighborhood living facilities of 3397.23 - Private Institutes - Class II neighborhood living facilities of 4575.86 - General bath education and research facilities - Other education and research facilities - physical training facilities - religious facilities - church - religious facilities of 5498.32 on the ground of other education and research facilities.

C. On September 18, 2018, the Defendant determined on September 18, 2018 that “the relevant parcel was densely concentrated in apartment, housing, elementary school, kindergarten, child-care center, and private teaching institutes in the vicinity of the Class 2 general residential area, relative protection zone, and absolute protection zone, making it difficult for users to walk and communicate with the vehicle at ordinary times. Given the characteristics of the use of the building (such as religious facilities and educational and research facilities), the vehicle traffic is also increased as users concentrated at a specific

arrow