A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant came to know of the victim C (n't.) through the introduction of friendly B.

On July 30, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 00:20 on July 30, 2019, the Defendant told that “I wish to see the victim’s knife h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.s.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.s.h.h.h.h.s.h.h.h.s.h.h.h.h.h.s.h.h.h.h.h.s.h.s.h.h.h.s.h.h.s.h.h.

[1] On December 12, 2019, the victim’s statement is consistent from the first statement made by the police to the testimony made by this court, and is inconsistent with the victim’s statement in light of the empirical rule, and there is no unreasonable or contradictory part in itself in light of the substance of the statement, and as long as the motive or reason for making a false statement is not clearly revealed, the credibility of the statement should not be rejected without any justifiable reason (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2019Do5797, Dec. 12, 2019).

Furthermore, the following circumstances add credibility to the statements of the victim.

A. The victim reported on 112 on the day of the instant case, and stated that the victim was sexually committed against the Defendant by the Defendant’s friendship B.

B. Although it is somewhat unclear that the Defendant and the victim met immediately before committing the instant crime, B et al. re-entering in the instant singing room immediately after the instant crime was committed, it does not affect the conclusion of the case, even though it does not affect the conclusion of the case.

2.3.2