Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the main place of the "E" restaurant located in Gyeonggi-do, and Defendant B is the operator of the above restaurant.

Defendant

A around November 16, 2015, the Vice-Governor of the Labor Welfare Corporation located in the Government of the Republic of Korea, and the fact was that, on November 5, 2015, at the alley-dong, Dong-si, Dong-si on the alley-dong, Dong-si, Dong-si, and suffered an injury with the left-fluord aggregate of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the year.

“Preparation of an application for medical care benefits and business suspension benefits; Defendant B signed and sealed to the left-hand side of the application for medical care benefits and business suspension benefits; Defendant A submitted an application for medical care benefits and business suspension benefits to the Deputy Governor of the Labor Welfare Corporation, who received KRW 26,133,760 from the Labor Welfare Corporation as a sum of the benefits and business suspension benefits around that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute specified in an application for benefits for industrial accident compensation insurance, business trip name, medical record, insurance benefit ledger, and detailed inquiry into the benefit ledger;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions regarding criminal facts: Article 127(2) of the former Act on the Compensation Insurance for Industrial Accidents (Amended by Act No. 14499, Dec. 27, 2016); Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants: Imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter, taking into account favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) provides that the insurance proceeds for industrial accident compensation for which the Defendants conspired in collusion for the reasons for sentencing and received unfair demand is considerably larger than KRW 26 million.

These crimes have led to damage to all workers suffering from industrial accidents due to vain, and eventually, it is necessary to strictly punish them at a general preventive level.

Defendant

In the absence of cooperation between B, the crime of this case could not occur, and the defendant B also has the same responsibility as the defendant A.