Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has been the Dong representative of D Apartment, and the victim E is a person who has been the chairperson of the above apartment.

1. On May 15, 2014, the Defendant embezzled the apartment fund in G and H’s 15:00 on May 1, 2014, the Defendant embezzled the apartment fund or embezzled the amount of KRW 100 million for public funds among several customers, despite the fact that the injured party did not have any relationship with the new accounting and internal relations.

The apartment fund shall be used in the way of writing the apartment construction with the mind of the construction, and it shall be in the way of construction without public announcement.

New accounting ditches is a pety.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by talking “.”

2. The Defendant, from the end of June, 2014 to the beginning of July, 2014, at the “Yangdong market” located in the Guangdong-dong, and the fact that the injured party embezzled the apartment fund, or did not have any new accounting and internal-related party, the Defendant embezzled the apartment fund to J and the market merchants, who are residents of the above apartment.

The apartment fund shall be used in mind while constructing apartment buildings, and it shall be in the way of construction without public announcement.

New accounting ditches is a pety.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by talking “.”

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of K Witness;

1. A witness G or part of theJ’s legal statement;

1. Application of the statutes of each police statement protocol to K, G, and J;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the same Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the defense counsel stated in the instant charges 2.