logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.08.20 2018가합876
대여금
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) Interim waste disposal business entity C (hereinafter “C”)

As a part of profit-making business, the Korea Electric Power Corporation entered into a sales contract for non-product with the content of demolishing the pulmonary pressure from the Korea Electric Power Corporation and entrusted a third party equipped with facilities and human resources required by the relevant laws and regulations with the business to receive part of the profit therefrom as D. (2) around September 4, 2009, C entered into a contract with E Co., Ltd. with the representative director (hereinafter “E”) to delegate the above waste disposal business for one year and receive 40,000 won per 1 closed voltage period, and around September 30, 2010, C entered into a contract with the representative director of E Co., Ltd to perform a business delegation with the content that the Defendant would have delegated the above waste disposal business for one year and received 40,000 won per 1 closed voltage period (hereinafter “instant contract”). The remainder was 15% of the purchase price of non-product.

3) On September 7, 2009, C transferred a waste interim disposal business license from F, and established H business office in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si. The Defendant became the head of the above business office at that time and run an interim disposal business for closed voltages. (B) By-products supply contract E is around September 2, 2009, Co., Ltd. I (hereinafter “I”).

(2) The agreement between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on the supply of goods of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “instant goods supply agreement”) to sell by-products, such as rinium and glass, arising from the process of dismantling and treating pulmonary pressures

(C) Since September 2010, both companies asserted that E, I would set the cost of delivery of the instant goods and would not pay the price properly, and that I would cancel the instant goods supply contract, and that I would like to violate the above argument against the unjustifiable assertion.

2. In the process.

arrow