logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.06.26 2018가단5514
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 98,303,281 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from August 19, 2016 to June 26, 2019, and June 27, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At around 19:00 on August 19, 2016, C driving a D car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and making a left-hand turn from the border in the direction of the e-mail in the e-mail in the e-mail from the e-mail-U.S. Chang-gun, Chang-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant intersection”). In such a case, the front bank and the left-hand turn well and the left-hand turn should be operated, and when making a left-hand turn to the intersection, the steering gear and operation of the steering gear shall be accurately conducted. In the case of a vehicle that is going to the right-hand turn to the intersection, due to negligent negligence in giving rise to the left-hand side of the Plaintiff’s driver’s driving, who was directly in the direction of the e-mail in the direction of the e-mail (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”), regardless of the existence of the duty of care to yield the course to the vehicle.

B. The Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as saveal damage on the following Bridges, saves of saves, saves of saves, and saves, etc., due to the instant accident.

C. The defendant is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid contract for the defendant vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant, who is the mutual aid business operator of defendant vehicle, is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages incurred by the plaintiff due to the accident in this case.

B. However, the limitation of liability is limited, inasmuch as a number of vehicles prior to the Defendant’s vehicle had been negligent in neglecting the duty to keep the left at the front and the duty to keep the left, even though they had been well aware of the circumstances leading to the left-hand turn, such circumstance should be considered in calculating the amount of damages that the Defendant would compensate, but the Defendant’s liability is limited to 80% by deeming the Plaintiff’

As to this, the defendant, 1.

arrow