A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has violated the prohibition on driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on November 30, 2008 by driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol 0.05% on July 4, 2013 and 0.070% of alcohol level on July 4, 2013 at least twice.

On September 25, 2013, around 20:25, the Defendant driven a B-hurbn vehicle while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.208% at the 43-lane 17, Gumi-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, inquiry records, and copies of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include a number of defendants with the same kind and the same criminal records, and in particular, on March 31, 201, for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc., with a deadly weapon, etc., a suspended sentence of three years shall be imposed; and

4. 8. 위 판결이 확정되어 집행유예기간 중 음주운전을 하여 벌금형의 처벌을 받은 점, 그럼에도 또다시 집행유예기간 중 음주운전을 하고 주차된 차량을 들이받아 또 다른 차량과 부딪히게 하고 담벼락까지 들이받은 사고를 일으킨 점, 음주수치가 매우 높은 점 등 불리한 정상 및 몸이 불편한 노모의 바람 쐬러 가자는 요청으로 음주운전을 하여 그 동기에 있어서 참작할 사정이 있는 점, 동종범죄로 벌금형을 초과하는 전과는 없는 점 등 유리한 정상 등 제반 사정을 참작하여, 주문과 같이 형을 정한다.