The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects the wrongness of the defendant, that the defendant suffers from a certificate of alcohol alcohol, and that the defendant has a family member to support the defendant.

However, the crime of this case committed six victims with injury, special assault, assault, or safmption during the period of about four months, and its nature is not very good, such as assault using dangerous objects, etc.

The Defendant did not agree with the victims at all until the time of the trial, and did not recover from the victims.

The accused has been 15 times or more due to violent crimes, and has been 7 times or more due to such crimes.

In addition, the crime of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime due to robbery.

In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances, the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed as unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.