logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.07.24 2014고단2535
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a taxi engineer who is engaged in driving a rocketing car.

On April 17, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car on April 02:50, and led to a road of about 38 km from the direction of the north-gu north-gu, Daegu to drive the said car on a speed of about 28 km along that of the road from the direction of the north-gu, Ulsan-do.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle temporarily stops or reduces speed and sees the right and the right and the right of the road, and to safely drive the crosswalk.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not find out the victim D (the age of 22) who walked the above crosswalk from the right side of the defendant's proceeding to the left side due to the negligence of the defendant's negligence in the course of his duty, and did not take the victim D (the age of 2) and got the victim to go beyond the ground with the part of the victim's body in front of the car.

In this regard, the Defendant suffered injury, such as an pelle electronic pelle, which requires approximately 10 weeks of treatment, from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of the Medical Certificate (D) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order causes the instant accident in violation of the duty to protect pedestrians at crosswalks, and the injury suffered by the victim is not weak, but the Defendant is in profoundly against the instant crime, the instant vehicle is subscribed to the mutual aid association, and the instant vehicle is entirely agreed with the victim, and is punished for the same crime.

arrow