Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
No person shall lend an access medium while receiving, demanding or promising to receive compensation in using or managing the access medium.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, on March 22, 2018, stated in the bill of indictment on March 22, 2018, “Seoul around March 21, 2018” is an error.
In order to receive a total of KRW 12 million from a person who is unable to know the name of "C" at the defendant's residence in Young-gu, Suwon-si, the defendant sent 4 personal card, which is a accessible medium connected to Kwikset-si's deposit account (Account Number: D), a new bank deposit account (Account Number: E), a single bank deposit account (Account Number:F) and a company bank deposit account (Account Number: G): and the company bank deposit account (Account Number: G) by using Kwikset-si, while informing the relevant account number and password to KaKakao Stockholm.
Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay for the damages and lent the approaching media.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A H statement;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph the details of transfer, the details of financial transactions reply, and the Kakao Stockholm;
1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment is a lending of the access media by the defendant in return for promise, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime, and the number of access media lent by the defendant is not less than four, and it is also necessary to strictly punish the defendant in that some of the access media lent by the defendant was used for the telephone financial fraud crime.
However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, the defendant is the first offender, and the defendant is the other person.