beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle BMW750.
At around 13:30 on September 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) while driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.154% of the blood alcohol content from the surface of the steering distance to the surface of the e-rain bank; (b) by failing to perform the duty of care to accurately operate the steering and steering system, the Defendant, while driving the said vehicle, by failing to perform the duty of care; (c) by failing to perform the steering and left well; and (d) by failing to perform the duties of care to accurately operate the steering and steering system on the right side of the E-ra vehicle operated by the Ra, which was signaled by the victim F, who was signaled by the victim F, who was in the atmosphere at the right side of the said two-lane.
As a result, the defendant suffered injuries, such as a shoulder shacker shacker, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.
2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “MW750”), as stated in the above paragraph (1), while driving a vehicle in the vicinity of the third bridge in the Si of Jinjin-si at around 15:00 on the same day and driving the vehicle again after undergoing an investigation by the police, and driving the vehicle again, and driving the vehicle at the vicinity of the third bridge in the Si of Jinjin-si at around 15:00 on the same day, with a blood alcohol content of at least 0.198% under the influence of the said BMW750, while driving the vehicle at the right by driving the vehicle at the above BMW750 on the right, due to the negligence that he well sees the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and operates the steering gear accurately at the market on the side of the third bridge in violation of the occupational duty of care to accurately operate the steering vehicle at the market on the right and stopping the vehicle without any necessary measures.
The defendant continued to do so at around 15:08 on the same day, Myeoncheon-si, Myeoncheon-si, Myeoncheon-si, and Domine-si.