logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.04.07 2016고정144
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 18, 2015, the Defendant driven a two-lane road in the direction of Daejeon or Daejeon High Highway, 79.4 km in sight, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.063% during blood transfusion, and driving a three-lane-lane-lane-road car owned by the Defendant at the time of special self-government of Sejong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. The application of the laws and regulations to the investigation report (as regards the above dmark formula application);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) (excluding punishment) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. On November 18, 2015, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle of 0.063% alcohol during blood transfusion at around 23:43, while driving a motor vehicle of 0.063% owned by the Defendant, and driving a two-lane road at the location of Daejeon-do or Daejeon-do Highway Daejeon-gu 79.4km at the location of Sejong-do Special Self-Governing Province.

The defendant was driven by the victim D in the front bank.

E Track section was received in front of the front part of the E Track section, and the upper right side of the high-priced bridge and the center wall were continued to be separated.

As a result, the defendant suffered about KRW 1,043,350 physical damage to the victim's vehicle, but did not immediately stop and take necessary measures and did not take any measures.

2. 판단 교통사고 보고, 수사보고( 전화조사 )에 의하면, 피고인이 당시 피해자의 차량 뒷부분을 앞부분으로 들이받은 다음 고가 교량 우측 옹벽을 우측 앞부분으로 들이받고, 좌측에 있는 중앙 분리 벽을 좌측 앞부분으로 들이받은 후 정차한 사실, 피해자는 자신의 차량 뒷부분에서 ‘ 쿵’ 소리를 듣고 타이어가 터지는 줄 알고 갓길로 500미터 정도 이동하였는데 하차할 곳이 없어서 약 500미터 전방에 있는 졸음 쉼터로 이동하여 정차한 후 차량 범퍼와 깜박이 등이...

arrow