All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the court below to the defendant (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below on the defendant is too unfortunate and unfair.

2. The judgment of the court below is that when the defendant is detained for about four months as a result of each of the crimes of this case, the defendant reflects his mistake in depth, the violation of the Road Traffic Act in which the judgment becomes final and conclusive, and the equality in the case where each of the crimes of this case is adjudicated simultaneously, and there is no record that the defendant has been sentenced to punishment, etc. favorable to the defendant, and the defendant does not reach an agreement with the victims of each of the traffic accidents of this case until the defendant was tried in court, and there are several criminal records, such as the violation of the Road Traffic Act and the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act. The vehicle driven at the time of the case of 2010No894 is not insured, and the vehicle driven at the time of the case of 2010No1051 is covered by a comprehensive insurance policy with a limited special agreement, and thus, it is difficult to compensate the damage caused by the accident of the defendant who is not the owner of the vehicle, and tried to conceal his name by stealing his criminal acts in the investigation process, and avoid the circumstances of the defendant's punishment.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is groundless, and Article 364 of the Criminal Procedure Act is not reasonable.