logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.07.20 2017노741
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

In light of the misunderstanding of the substance of the grounds for appeal and the misunderstanding of the legal principles (unfair exemption from disclosure or notification order), the nature of the defendant's crime and the method of the defendant's disclosure or notification of the information about the defendant, the court below's exemption from the order of disclosure or notification of the registered information to the defendant is improper or erroneous.

The sentence that the court below sentenced against the defendant (4 million won in penalty, 24 hours in order to complete a sexual assault treatment program, confiscation) is unfair because it is too uneasible.

Judgment

As to the unfair argument that exemption from disclosure or notification order is unfair, there are special circumstances that may not disclose or notify personal information, as prescribed by the proviso to Article 49(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse.

The issue of whether a case constitutes “a case to be determined” ought to be determined by comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, occupation, risk of recidivism, characteristics of the offender, such as the type, motive, process, consequence, seriousness of the crime, etc. of the crime, characteristics of the crime, such as disclosure order or notification order, the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the Defendant’s injury due to the disclosure order or notification order, the preventive effects of the sexual crime subject to registration, and the effects on the protection of the victims from the sexual crime subject to registration (see Supreme Court Decision 2011Do14676, Jan. 27, 2012). In light of the aforementioned legal principles, health class, Defendant recognized the instant crime, and reflects it, without any history of punishment for the sexual crime, and the registration of personal information of the Defendant and the effects of the protection of the victims from the sexual crime subject to registration.

In addition, the defendant's age, occupation, family environment, social relationship, criminal record and risk of recidivism, and profits and prevention expected by the disclosure order or notification order of this case.

arrow