logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.08 2016가합506910
손해배상(지)
Text

1. Of the Plaintiff’s primary claim, the part of the Plaintiff’s obligee’s subrogation claim against the Defendant Gowon Housing Co., Ltd.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the business of general advertising agency business, online information provision, car slopingg and producing printed materials, and the defendant Go Korea Housing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Go Korea Housing Co., Ltd.") is a corporation engaged in construction business, landscaping business, housing construction and selling business, etc., and the design date of the defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant design date") is a corporation engaged in manufacturing and selling banner, signboard manufacturing and selling business, etc.

Around October, 2014, the Defendant Gopo-si was the executor of the Gopo-si 1089 Gopo-si's Multi-Family Housing Construction Project, which was located in Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, 1089, for an advertising agency service contract for the sale of Gopo-si's multi-family housing. The Plaintiff and the Defendant Design Foundation participated in the above bidding under the name of the Defendant Design Foundation, and they are in charge of business and overall advertising, such as entering into a contract in their name. The Plaintiff is in charge of the design work, and the Plaintiff is in charge of the preparation of a proposal, draft, design planning, etc., and the profits accrued from the above advertising contract are divided by 50% (hereinafter referred to as the "instant agreement"), and the Defendant Gopo-si was selected as the Defendant Design Foundation.

The Plaintiff, along with the measures to change the brand of “high canal dynas” into “high dynasium”, proposed Go dynasium. Defendant Go dynasium accepted it and entered into a contract for Go dynas advertising agency with the service cost of KRW 793,00,000 (excluding value-added tax) on July 21, 2015.

(hereinafter “instant advertising contract”). From July 2015 to October 2015, the Plaintiff performed advertising agency business, such as the printing of Round related to Round, exposure to broadcasting, production of promotional products, online and outdoor advertising, banner, production, etc., and Defendant Round Housing is on Defendant Round.

arrow