logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.03.29 2017노2293
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) since the defendant submitted a self-denunciation statement before the police investigation and trial, he/she is deemed to be sincere and led to confession of all the crimes; (b) as the defendant was aware of the crime, he/she was aware of the crime to the victims; (c) he/she neglected to recognize the crime; (d) he/she distributed video taken by the defendant to others or used for profit; (e) he/she did not use the video taken by the defendant; (e) he/she made efforts to prevent recidivism by completing education for the prevention of sexual violence; (e) having received mental treatment and volunteer service; (g) having sent the defendant a siren brokerage and driving by proxy after he/she was subject to the disciplinary action in this case; (g) having been detained for a certain period of time; (g) having been detained by the defendant and his/her family members; (g) having been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a certain period of time; and (g) having taken account of the fact that the defendant's spouse's excessive imprisonment with prison labor for the defendant's life and working period of time after being detained.

2. The judgment of the Defendant: (a) the Defendant entered the conference room next to the escape room for female employees working for the same company with the Defendant, and trusted the Defendant; (b) installed in the inner direction of the escape room in the front part of the wall-to-door camera in the front part of the wall-to-be space; and (c) taken the front side of the escape room in the front part of the wall-to-beer room; and (d) recovered if the storage capacity exceeds that.

arrow