The punishment of the defendant is set forth in Section 2-A, Section 2-B, and Section 1 of the Judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On July 2, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months due to breach of trust, etc. at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 10th of the same month.

In addition, on November 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two months of imprisonment and eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Gwangju District Court, respectively, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 13, 2016.

1. The Defendant, “2016 Highest 5313,” is a person who runs a housing construction business in the course of operating a mutual building firm called “D” in the Southern-gun C of the Republic of Korea.

A. On July 12, 2014, the Defendant committed fraud: (a) around July 12, 2014, around July 12, 2014, to the victim F at the site of the Housing Construction Corporation located in the Nam-gun E, Nam Nam-gun, around July 12, 2014.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the cost of construction to the victim, since the Defendant spent a large amount of materials and personnel expenses at other construction sites, and there was no special property.

In this regard, the Defendant, as above, induced the victim to work for cutting off the amount of the construction cost of approximately KRW 450,000,000, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the price.

B. On September 23, 2014, the Defendant committed fraud: (a) around September 23, 2014, at the housing construction site located behind H located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju around September 23, 2014, the victim I would give the victim I the cost of construction on the ground that “The interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior construction works

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the cost of construction to the victim, since the Defendant spent a large amount of materials and personnel expenses at other construction sites, and there was no special property.

However, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and let the victim do interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior works equivalent to 4.84,00 won at the construction site of the above house, thereby acquiring pecuniary profits equivalent to the price.

(c)

around May 19, 2015, fraud.