1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The G (G and Gwangju-gun), in 1911, was assessed against the G (G and Gwangju-gun) prior to the subdivision of the situation of the land prior to the subdivision (hereinafter “instant original land”).

B. The original land of this case, including the division, merger, etc. of the original land of this case, was subject to the division and conversion of the area around November 15, 1957, around September 20, 1960, around December 28, 1961, and around October 5, 197, the land of this case was 4,985 square meters prior to the division (hereinafter “land prior to the division”).

Afterwards, the land before subdivision was divided into 3,960 square meters before E on January 4, 1984 (hereinafter “instant land”).

C. (1) On September 22, 1964, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the first future with respect to the land before subdivision. (2) On June 10, 1985, I died, and J completed the registration of ownership transfer due to inheritance based on consultation division around May 29, 1986.

Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer from J on December 30, 2005 due to the gift of December 23, 2005.

3) Defendant C&C (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is abbreviationd.

(D) Around September 28, 2010 and around September 28, 2018, Defendant B created a collateral security and superficies as stated in the purport of the claim. D. Around May 8, 1939, K (K and permanent Gwangju-gun L) which is the Plaintiff’s inheritance relationship Plaintiff was killed and solely succeeded to the property of K, which is the ex post facto frier of the deceased deceased deceased deceased M (Death on February 4, 1913). N was killed on or around February 17, 1978, N was jointly succeeded to N’s property, and O also succeeded to N’s property on or around April 12, 199, and the Plaintiff died on or around April 12, 199 and succeeded to the Plaintiff’s property of O. [Grounds for recognition], Gap’s 1,5 or 8(including each of the statements, the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion that registration of ownership preservation on the land of this case in the name of I, who is not a situation-based person, is null and void, and thus, the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the defendant B, which was transferred from the former, is also null and void, and the land of