1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 (private million).

2. When the defendant does not pay a fine, 10,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 06:30 on June 11, 2015, the Defendant insultd the victims of sexual harassment with the main agent of the packaging and drinking value at the time of the incident in front of the “Cnatt club” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant sent a dispute after receiving 112 reports, on the sloping E, the victim F, the police officer of the police station, the police officer G, and the police officer of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station D police station, who were called for after receiving 112 reports, while the victims of sexual assault, such as I, are being able to protect the victims of sexual harassment.”

2. On the same day as in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant, at the same time as in the same place as in the foregoing paragraph, she was solicited several times to have a police officer feel home and returned home from E, she, by her hand, kiddd up twice the shoulder, her body was pushed up twice by tightly, her body was pushed up twice with the shoulder, and her hand, who was attached to E’s outer part of her body, continued to do so.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement in each complaint of E, F, G, and H;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statements of E, F, G, and H;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment provided for in the offense of insult against victim E, which is the most serious offense among the crimes of insult);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not good for the defendant’s desire to police officers and to interfere with the performance of official duties, the defendant’s mistake is against the police officers, and the police officers are selected to take into account the circumstances of the crime, and the sentence is determined like the order of the fine.