1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the AA vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a mutual aid operator who has entered into an automobile comprehensive mutual aid contract with respect to the B bus (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant

B. On December 20, 2013, around 21:05, the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which were bypassed through the bypass route while the Defendant bus was straighted in accordance with the new signals at the Gangnam-gu Seoul Samsung Station Intersection, took place.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). C.

On December 31, 2013, the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 851,00 at the cost of repairing the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserts that the accident in this case occurred due to the negligence on the part of Defendant bus, since the plaintiff's bus was rapidly changed from the rear side of the four-lanes to the four-lanes while the plaintiff's vehicle has completed the entry into the four-lanes of the main bus, and the bus was rapidly changed from the third to the four-lanes.

The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by adding the overall purport of the pleadings to the images of the evidence Nos. 5, 6, and 2, namely, the defendant bus transit through the intersection by the crosssection signal, and thereafter, it appears that the left part of the plaintiff bus seems to have been left by the defendant vehicle, considering the fact that the body of the plaintiff vehicle and the defendant bus did not put the body of the body of the plaintiff vehicle into the right side of the defendant vehicle and the defendant bus, and the body of the body of the body of the plaintiff vehicle and the defendant bus are insignificant enough, and the plaintiff vehicle used to enter the right side of the road through the intersection by the right line at the right line at the time of the right line at the point of the right line, without lowering the speed (the left part of the plaintiff vehicle seems to have been left on the defendant vehicle).