1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The part of the plaintiff's claim added in the trial shall be dismissed.

3. Appeal.

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation on this part of the claim for confirmation of invalidity of each resolution are as follows: (a) the date of the Supreme Court’s judgment in the overall title No. 4-5 of the judgment of the first instance court and the cited part of the case number in the overall title No. 4-5 of the judgment of the first instance are deleted; and (b) the family judgment between the 16th and the 12th 6th 12 of the same judgment are excluded; and (c) except for the modification or addition, it is identical

On December 2, 1921, the name of the defendant foundation was changed on December 2, 1921, the second to 9-10 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the defendant registered the original name of the defendant foundation as "Seoul, Yangsung and Seosung (Seoul) Foundation", and the defendant completed the registration of incorporation on December 2, 1921 with the permission for its establishment on November 10, 1921, and then the above name was changed to "Seoul, Samsung, a Foundation" and "The above name was changed to "the Foundation for Samsung, a Foundation" and "the grounds for recognition" of the second to 16th of the judgment of the court of first instance, "No. 9 and Eul No. 2" added "the third to 7-8 of the judgment of the court of first instance," and "the court below did not obtain the defendant's temporary approval of the board of directors on April 6, 2012," and changed the name of the defendant's "the court below's temporary approval of the second to 31.

2. The part of the claim for invalidation of registration is that the name of the defendant on the corporate register was changed on June 20, 1963 and thus invalid on the same ground as the defendant alleged earlier, according to the resolution of the general meeting of shareholders on December 10, 1962, and the defendant is the minister of issuance.