A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) made use of the official approval color pen for the purpose of uttering in the real estate indication column of the real estate lease site for real estate lease contract in the Busan-gu Busan-gu, Busan-do, C, structural concrete, office for use, size 20 square meters; (b) KRW 20,000,000,000 for monthly rent; and (c) in the column for special agreement, the Defendant deposited monthly rent into the account D(E) F in the column for the terms and conditions of the lease contract; (b) entered “E” in the lessor column and “A” in the lessee column; and (c) sealed the E’s seal prepared in advance to E name.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On May 9, 2016, the Defendant exercised a forged real estate lease agreement by providing one copy of the forged E’s real estate lease agreement to H as if it was genuine, at the “I” office operated by GH at Changwon-si’s window around 16:00 on May 9, 2016.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph on May 9, 2016, shall give the victim H a security deposit of the lease agreement as security.

In order for the Republic of Korea to operate the K store in Busan J, there is about 50% discount rate when receiving Chinese goods and selling retailers to the retailers, and there is a lack of funds to lend money to the retailers, the above business will be repaid in full.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, since 2010, the Defendant received a large amount of personal debt from a lending brokerage company, and thus was in a situation where he received a loan through the lending brokerage company, and provided the forged real estate lease contract as if it was genuinely prepared, and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan even if he/she borrowed money from the damaged party due to the lack of the store or business entity operated by himself/herself.

After all, the defendant deceivings the victim as such.