Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 9,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

around 02:54 on January 18, 2016, the Defendant attempted to steal the inside property of the Defendant, such as E SPP car owned by the Victim D, the Victim F-owned G-W car, the Victim H, the Victim J-owned K QM5 passenger car, the Victim J-owned MM car, the Victim N N-owned passenger car, QM5 passenger car, the Victim P-owned QM5 passenger car, the Victim R-owned passenger car, the Victim R-owned passenger car, UM3 passenger car owned by the Victim T-owned by the Victim, the Victim W-owned passenger car, the 10 passenger car, the 10 passenger car in total, such as the Victim PRI car owned by the Victim, and the 10 passenger car in W-owned B-owned passenger car, and the vehicle was not set off, but the vehicle did not carry out an attempted attempt.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation report (not more than 11 pages of evidence records), CCTV video records;

1. A detailed statement of reported case processing; and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (related to the verification of the owner of a damaged vehicle, the victims' call report);

1. Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of probation is a reason for sentencing unfavorable to the Defendant. However, the previous crime and the instant crime committed by the Defendant, who was sentenced to suspended execution, do not belong to the same type, and the Defendant appears to have led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime, and the Defendant does not repeat the same kind of crime in the future.

It is the reason for sentencing favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the victims are relatively minor, and that some victims do not want punishment.

In addition to the above sentencing grounds, the defendant's age, family relationship, and family relation.