A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From around 09:00 on July 8, 2016 to 10:10 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by abusing disturbance by force, such as having the victim talk with the victim, the victim, and the victim, in the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Jeju, without drinking alcohol to the Defendant. However, the Defendant collected the erops on the table, which are on the table, by putting the erobb, “cs and two-year arbs,” and by gathering the erops on the table, and even if the victim presented the Defendant several times at the outside of the restaurant, there was no wall, mobile phone, etc., even though the victim sent the Defendant, and caused the victim to the restaurant, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by abusing the disturbance by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (the closure and attachment of screen images at the site of the case);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (within the scope of sentencing guidelines) (the grounds for sentencing in the scope of sentencing guidelines): Suspension of prosecution of the Jeju District Public Prosecutor's Office that interferes with the duties on December 15, 2015, the period of suspension of prosecution of the Jeju Local Public Prosecutor's Office that interferes with the duties on September 7, 2015 (i) a fine of one million won of the Jeju District Court that interferes with the duties on September 7, 2015; (ii) a fine of one million won of the Jeju District Court that is a fine of one million won for the Jeju District Public Prosecutor's Office that is committed on November 14, 2015; and (iii) a suspension of prosecution of the Jeju Local Public Prosecutor's Office that interferes with the duties on December 15, 2015; and (iv) a measure for returning a passenger's fared fared marbb